This is why a single 285 is the right answeri wholly understand the need for two sujis. i had a 240mm suji which was my first japanese slicing knife, and i found the length a little short, so i got a 270mm and left the 240mm at my parents' place to use whenever i chip in with the grilling duties.
in using the 270mm i felt that sometimes there wasn't enough length, so i got a big mazaki which is about 305mm and "retired" the 270mm to my travel roll.
now i love the big mazaki but at 305mm it's a little much for a weeknight pork chop no matter how big the chop gets, so now i'm thinking about a "long" 240mm like a Misono or a French 10" again.
and for those of you arguing that a gyuto of similar length can do the same job.....why y'all even here
and i do have way too many gyutos in the 240 length, but it's not really the same, something about the taller height makes the cutting action feel much different compared to a suji.
I donāt need two, but I certainly want two. Pun intended.i wholly understand the need for two sujis. i had a 240mm suji which was my first japanese slicing knife, and i found the length a little short, so i got a 270mm and left the 240mm at my parents' place to use whenever i chip in with the grilling duties.
in using the 270mm i felt that sometimes there wasn't enough length, so i got a big mazaki which is about 305mm and "retired" the 270mm to my travel roll.
now i love the big mazaki but at 305mm it's a little much for a weeknight pork chop no matter how big the chop gets, so now i'm thinking about a "long" 240mm like a Misono or a French 10" again.
and for those of you arguing that a gyuto of similar length can do the same job.....why y'all even here
and i do have way too many gyutos in the 240 length, but it's not really the same, something about the taller height makes the cutting action feel much different compared to a suji.
This is why a single 285 is the right answer
Nothing wrong with two sujis. As others have mentioned, I'd consider weight/thickness in addition to length. You could always get a nice Sakai 270 that runs a little short as a one-and-done. But I could also see getting a nice 240 and then more affordable long suji for the handful of times you want the length.
I have a 300, a few 270s, and a few 210s. Maybe I need a 240?
and i do have way too many gyutos in the 240 length, but it's not really the same, something about the taller height makes the cutting action feel much different compared to a suji.
This is why a single 285 is the right answer
No doubt, 2 is always better than one when knives are concerned. Just trying to point out the 240+300 nonsense, when clearly 285 is the way to go. If for some unknown to me reason I were forced to get a 240 though, I'd just get this one or similar WTS - 240mm Apex Ultra San-Mai SujihikiActually two 285's is the right answer, though one more........
as a matter of fact i got one a few weeks agoBut do you have a KS?
But do you have a KS?
That's not suji-esque in my book. Just because it isn't following the trend of ever taller gyutos doesn't mean it isn't one...
Because it's too tall. At 48mm - taller than most 210 gyutos - it simply feels and works like a gyuto, not a sujihiki. Virtually all sujihikis are <40mm. It's only when you get in that 40-45mm range that I think you can really start talking about 'in between' nomenclature.Ok... just for fun.... Why isnt it suji-esque?
Very clearly the KS series are still gyutos... but they run long for their advertised length. That reduces their height-to-length ratio. I dont think anybody here is claiming they are sujis... but the stretched out profile moves them in that direction. Hence the 'esque' suffix?
This isn't advocacy or defence of one profile or another. Just noting that profiles occur in degrees and that some knives approach blurred boundaries. Seems particularly appropriate since @nickw_ raised the idea of a transitionary knife in his second post!!
It's only when you get in that 40-45mm range that I think you can really start talking about 'in between' nomenclature.
Best way to ***** your needs are by cooking. Just get oneāyou'll soon know if it's too long, too short, too light, too much height, too reactive, etc. Really depends on what you end up liking more than anything else. I have sujis ranging from 225 to 280-ishāthey all get used.I am wanting to buy a sujihiki. I have done a self assessment of my needs, and read literally dozens of threads on length. So I'm not looking to turn this into a 240 vs 270 vs 300 debate. Nor a "please recommend a knife" post.
I am considering buying both a 240mm and a 300mm. My hope is to bounce this off everyone, and see if most people think it's a good idea.
___
Here's what I am thinking:
Based on how we eat (more small, European portion sizes) a 240mm sujihiki will likely suffice for 90-95%+ of our needs. I can really only see a need for a 270-300mm perhaps 15-20 times a year.
As a home cook, for day to day, my 210mm gyuto is usually long enough for slicing single portions of protien. However, there are enough times where I have thought a little extra length would be nice; typically for things like beef tenderloin, smaller roasts, turkey breasts, etc... But by and large, I think a 240mm would cover the vast majority of things. As a side, it's worth noting two things:
- 1) I tend to favour small, more precise and nimble knives.
- 2) We do eat lots of sushi and I will add a yanagiba at some point, to alleviate the need for the sujihiki to assume this role.
However, I do occasional make large roasts (prime rib, brisket, leg of ham, etc), or breakdown larger cuts into steaks, so I think a 300mm would be nice. Perhaps even 330mm, so I can still have 310-320mm of actual cutting edge. Again, I wouldn't use this often, but sometimes a long knife is the right tool for the job.
Thus my thinking is:
To get a very high quality 240mm sujihiki for my daily needs, and more affordable 300mm for times when something longer is needed. Rather than getting a single 270mm; which I see as a compromise on both ends: too long for most things, too short for some, but the goldilocks length if you need to pick just one. A single 300mm would do everything, but far larger than I am wanting daily knife.
So are two sujihiki's (240mm and 300mm) better than one? What do you think about this approach?
Thanks,
Nick
That's what she said.......300mm for when I need every inch I can get.
Hi Nick. Two or three are better than one for sure. I'd rather have my extreme combo (a 210mm takohiki and 360mm granton slicer) than just one proper 270mm suji. But I'm just glad that I got all three, plus a tanaka 300mm yanagi for well, y'know... The takohiki has a kaku tip while the f.dick is rounded, so the kaeru filled that gap as well. They are ranging from 25mm to 35mm tall. Tony.
Iāve used a 240 gyuto before and I donāt like them. While they do have their place, I prefer light and nimble. Iām also cooking at home, so Iām not needing to process volume every day. Different strokes for different folks.On the original question... if all you're doing with it is slicing and portioning I'm not sure there's all that much added value in necessarily getting a sujihiki; a gyuto in the same length might do an equal job while being somewhat more versatile. So you could consider getting a 240 gyuto instead.
If you just want something long and affordable for rare occasions, getting something like a cheap Victorinox slicer in that kind of length might be an option. If you want something slightly nicer an entry level 270 or 300 suji like Fujiwara, Tojiro or any of the other entry level yo handle J-knives could do the trick.
Best way to ***** your needs are by cooking. Just get oneāyou'll soon know if it's too long, too short, too light, too much height, too reactive, etc. Really depends on what you end up liking more than anything else. I have sujis ranging from 225 to 280-ishāthey all get used.
To which Iāve decided I want to go with a 240mm & 300mm.
Unless a 270mm honyaki drops in my lap for an unbelievable price. Then I would use that for awhile, just for fun. But I still suspect I would prefer the two knife combo.
Thatās no fun. I need to irrationally blow my budget on the first expensive knife that comes up.
Keep a reasonable gap between lengths. For a home cook, *I think* it is more fun to play with profiles/grinds/steels than incremental length changes. Something short and something long will take you far. The suggestion of a nice 240mm and a basic 300mm will serve you well (better than a single 270). Save that honyaki for a knife that you really know is your preferred length/profile/grind...
I am wanting something with a wa handle, and on the middle to upper end.What do you think of the Sakai Takayuki Western Blue gyuto? They're said to be lowish-height (allegedly 210mm x 41mm, 240mm x 46mm), so they might border on the range of the proportion you seek.
https://www.hocho-knife.com/sakai-takayuki-aoniko-blue-2-steel-chef-knife-gyuto-240mm/
They also have a 240mm bunka-sujihiki, but it's of a more conventional sujihiki height:
https://www.hocho-knife.com/sakai-takayuki-aoniko-blue-2-steel-slicer-sujihiki-240mm/
Thatās no fun. I need to irrationally blow my budget on the first expensive knife that comes up.
But in all seriousness, I am looking forward to the combo. I have a few ideas, but Iām waiting for items to come back into stock.
I am wanting something with a wa handle, and on the middle to upper end.
I was thinking something along the lines of a Hitohira Togashi double bevel, with a handle swap. But there a few other knives Iām looking at too. Some with a defined bevel, others are convex. Pros and Cons to both.
https://hitohira-japan.com/collecti...ts/aaa-026w1m-05-ga240?variant=39621954044057
I have assed my needs, my question was more one of āIs having two reasonable?ā. To which Iāve decided, Yes, and I want to go with a 240mm & 300mm.
Unless a 270mm honyaki drops in my lap for an unbelievable price. Then I would use that for awhile, just for fun. But I still suspect I would prefer the two knife combo.
Enter your email address to join: